3 ms·

I wonder why both sides turned down Gonzales-Rodgers' proposition to allow the game back on and place Apple's 30% in an escrow account until the case is decided

• asdfasgasdgasdg 5y ago
  It is well for Epic for this dispute to remain live in the eyes of the public, because a legislative solution in their favor is possibly more likely than a judicial one. On the other hand, Apple doesn't want the world to see how the sky fails to fall in when their iron grip is slightly loosened.
• smoldesu 5y ago
  Probably because it presents a lose-lose situation for both parties involved. Epic is still getting their profits cut, and Apple can't be certain if they'll even profit off IAPs at all. In my eyes, that's legal stalemate.