2 ms·
The article seems to imply that, even if the extra enforcement is 100% effective, the ratio is more like getting $2 for every $1 spent on enforcement
by Rebelgecko 5y ago
The article seems to imply that, even if the extra enforcement is 100% effective, the ratio is more like getting $2 for every $1 spent on enforcement
- kelnos 5y agoThe article is a little confusing in how it words it, but the actual "missing" tax revenue is $600B. The $160B figure is just for the top 1% of taxpayers. If $80B will bring in the rest of that $600B, it's more like $7.50 brought in for every $1 spent on enforcement. Still not $10:$1, but closer.
- Rebelgecko 5y agoThanks, I missed that