3 ms·
For a moment: Let's step aside from the glaring immorality of Ray-Ban (aka Luxottica SpA) and Facebook. And instead ask: Is there a reason to not immediately "
by woodpanel 5y ago
For a moment: Let's step aside from the glaring immorality of Ray-Ban (aka Luxottica SpA) and Facebook.
And instead ask: Is there a reason to not immediately "defend yourself" against any person who is looking at you with a pair of these? (Physically or not)
- SyzygistSix 5y agoI don't have a problem with people wearing these glasses as long as I'm allowed to wear full body armor and carry a disruptor beam.
- jensensbutton 5y ago> Is there a reason to not immediately "defend yourself" against any person who is looking at you with a pair of these? Yes. You would be guilty of assault and potentially end up in prison. You would not be in the "right" in this scenario.
- snuser 5y agoif enforced, wouldn't surprise me of flashmob style groups of protestors got together often and started doing it