>The only just approach is to apply the standard fairly to all people Surely everybody agrees with that, for everything, except that it communicates absolutely

>The only just approach is to apply the standard fairly to all people Surely everybody agrees with that, for everything, except that it communicates absolutely nothing about what is fair and uniform. I have no idea whether someone convicted of insider trading would be barred, or whether they should be, or whether the average person would want them to be. It always strikes me as weird when someone gives an example of something that they assume everybody agrees on, and it is something that surely 99.99% of the world has never thought of even once.