4 ms·
It's not literally false, but I got an inaccurate impression based on the headline. To me it implied a positive discovery of evidence rather than a ruling-out.
by prutschman 5y ago
It's not literally false, but I got an inaccurate impression based on the headline. To me it implied a positive discovery of evidence rather than a ruling-out.
If they'd said "determined new constraints on a hypothetical 5th force" or something I would have gotten a correct impression.