3 ms·
Some speculation: They have very little feedback about how interviews went from the rejected candidate's perspective. They withhold feedback about the candidate
by cosmotic 5y ago
Some speculation: They have very little feedback about how interviews went from the rejected candidate's perspective. They withhold feedback about the candidate so even if they did ask for feedback, it would be uninformed. Those that do get hired are the ones that went successfully through the broken interview process so they propagate it to their candidates as if it's the correct thing to do.
- specialist 5y agoSpot on. My hunch is you're correct. My radical proposal is to record interviews, for later playback and study. Ages ago, I ran for office. Very similar hazing ritual. The recorded endorsement interviews were generally terrific. Only one of the unrecorded interviews was constructive; I wish it had been recorded. The majority of unrecorded interviews were shit shows. Which then seeded more drama. I quickly learned to make my own recordings. Kinda like having dash cams.
- junon 5y agoThis is exactly my take, too. Once someone is rejected, the communication ends there for fear of litigation. And the spiral continues.