I agree, actually. I think a book published by a major academic press is a plus for any tenure/promotion committee. Further, this is definitely not just "exposi

I agree, actually. I think a book published by a major academic press is a plus for any tenure/promotion committee. Further, this is definitely not just "expository" work; as the article notes, they had a bunch of gaps/errors to fix. I expect the importance of those contributions would be reflected in strong recommendation letters for promotion.