4 ms·

Something about the "real world" in this trailer was portrayed too cleanly and fleshy - my memory of the first two movies was that the "real world" was bland, f

Something about the "real world" in this trailer was portrayed too cleanly and fleshy - my memory of the first two movies was that the "real world" was bland, flat, and empty, sterile.

deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
SV_BubbleTime 5y ago
I wouldn’t have described that so easily. You’re right. I understand why they had to go back. Why Neo had to lose his memory, why they had to go back to being “inside”. It’s been so long that it makes sense people want the first movie again. To take the pill and follow the rabbit. The woman in the red dress is there without a doubt. So unless there’s some reason for exactly what you described, that it’s all bright and shiny, and Doogie Houser is there, then yea, it’s a much different feel. Maybe it’s because they are “in the core”.
- fraqed 5y ago
  Some comments on YouTube have suggested that the brighter look to the Matrix is because at the end of Revolutions, Sati makes a beautiful sunrise for Neo. Resurrections will apparently occur in the seventh version of the Matrix, the one at the end of Revolutions.
afavour 5y ago
If I recall every scene in the "real world" was given a slightly green tint that made it look a little more "off" and sterile.
spuz 5y ago
When you say "real world" do you mean the matrix? Because we only get fractions of a second of a glimpse of the "real" world in this trailer as far as I can tell.
sto_hristo 5y ago
It became clean at the end of Revolutions (when the green tint was removed), signifying the transition to the truce. So since the imagery in the Resurrections trailer is clear, that means it picks up where it ended and will move on from there.
rswskg 5y ago
The original matrix had a distinct tint to it. Green. The real world was blue. This was...normal. Vivid, colourful even. It didn't feel like the matrix

4 ms·

Something about the "real world" in this trailer was portrayed too cleanly and fleshy - my memory of the first two movies was that the "real world" was bland, f

by yehudalouis 5y ago

Something about the "real world" in this trailer was portrayed too cleanly and fleshy - my memory of the first two movies was that the "real world" was bland, flat, and empty, sterile.

deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
SV_BubbleTime 5y ago
I wouldn’t have described that so easily. You’re right. I understand why they had to go back. Why Neo had to lose his memory, why they had to go back to being “inside”. It’s been so long that it makes sense people want the first movie again. To take the pill and follow the rabbit. The woman in the red dress is there without a doubt. So unless there’s some reason for exactly what you described, that it’s all bright and shiny, and Doogie Houser is there, then yea, it’s a much different feel. Maybe it’s because they are “in the core”.
- fraqed 5y ago
  Some comments on YouTube have suggested that the brighter look to the Matrix is because at the end of Revolutions, Sati makes a beautiful sunrise for Neo. Resurrections will apparently occur in the seventh version of the Matrix, the one at the end of Revolutions.
afavour 5y ago
If I recall every scene in the "real world" was given a slightly green tint that made it look a little more "off" and sterile.
spuz 5y ago
When you say "real world" do you mean the matrix? Because we only get fractions of a second of a glimpse of the "real" world in this trailer as far as I can tell.
sto_hristo 5y ago
It became clean at the end of Revolutions (when the green tint was removed), signifying the transition to the truce. So since the imagery in the Resurrections trailer is clear, that means it picks up where it ended and will move on from there.
rswskg 5y ago
The original matrix had a distinct tint to it. Green. The real world was blue. This was...normal. Vivid, colourful even. It didn't feel like the matrix