3 ms·
> “…Sports (where competition is the whole point outside of the Ivy League)…” the point of sports in the ivy league is also competition, whether they’re able t
by clairity 5y ago
> “…Sports (where competition is the whole point outside of the Ivy League)…”
the point of sports in the ivy league is also competition, whether they’re able to be as competitive as other leagues or not.
- mc32 5y agoYou could be right and I might be wrong. I get the feeling for them it’s more focused on sportsmanship and fellowship than adversarial competition. If the focus were on winning then they’d recruit like the other schools for their sports teams (pac10, bigEast, etc. I know some have expanded and names have changed)
- clairity 5y agoperhaps a greater percentage of ivy athletes play for "the love of the sport", as something less than 1% of all college athletes will go on to a professional career (and few of those will by ivy leaguers), but competition is certainly still central. folks who go to exclusive schools tend to be quite competitive, practically by definition. winning and being competitive are certainly not the same though. these athletes want to win, even if they're at a disadvantage and don't win as often as the big sports schools. note also that ivy leaguers tend to do better at sports in which money hasn't heavily distorted the playing field. the problem for ivies with respect to recruiting (for winning) is the academic admissions floor, not money (harvard and yale having two of the biggest endowments in history) nor necessarily even an aversion to cheating and corruption. top athletes are too conspicuous not to draw outsized scrutiny in that regard, and tarnishing the brand that way just isn't worth it.