3 ms·
Sources for this? I’ve followed Tom’s Hardware for a number of years and they’ve been blasting intel pretty hard lately for their failure to provide competitive
by d4mi3n 5y ago
Sources for this? I’ve followed Tom’s Hardware for a number of years and they’ve been blasting intel pretty hard lately for their failure to provide competitive offerings in the last gen or two of CPUs:
1. https://www.tomshardware.com/features/amd-vs-intel-cpus https://www.tomshardware.com/features/amd-vs-intel-cpus
2. https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-performance-cpus,5683.html https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-performance-cpus,5...
- smolder 5y agoNot blasting Intel for their recent failures would lose them all credibility. Note my claim was just that historically they have a pro Intel bias. It's tough to dig up stuff from well over a decade ago. Here's a passing reference to what I think is the same scandal I was thinking of, at least: https://hardforum.com/threads/warm-dual-core-opteron-165-newegg-for-154-ccbbe-2-7ghz.1140315/post-1030452448 https://hardforum.com/threads/warm-dual-core-opteron-165-new... It's not hard to find discussion of other cases of bias: https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/posts/32078480 https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/posts/32078480 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a87Iy7avG7o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a87Iy7avG7o Unfortunately I don't have a lot of time to find better sources. You can make up your own mind, but I don't trust them to be impartial.
- d4mi3n 5y agoFair points, and thanks for the references--I'd rather know about bias than not.