In fairness, I'm guessing that the problem here is the reporting of the situation and likely not the reality of what they actually did on board. I'd be really

In fairness, I'm guessing that the problem here is the reporting of the situation and likely not the reality of what they actually did on board. I'd be really surprised if they didn't follow the correct procedures as well as actually identify the source of the issue. What's most likely is simply that the statement released about the incident down plays it (as we've seen before) and omits the most important detail (what was on fire... was it important... etc)