3 ms·
You’re absolutely right. One of the affected people claimed in an article that I read that they were attacked in the street in the middle of DC. If this tech ex
by kritiko 5y ago
You’re absolutely right. One of the affected people claimed in an article that I read that they were attacked in the street in the middle of DC. If this tech exists and is really so portable, seems like you could do a lot more damage than just making some CIA and State Department employees retire early.
- ImPostingOnHN 5y agobelieve it or not, denying enemy spies from operating in a location, either directly, or via fear of direct action, is really useful for your own covert operations
- kritiko 5y agohttps://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/05/31/are-us-officials-under-silent-attack https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/05/31/are-us-officia... This New Yorker article from May alleges that somebody was hit on the grounds of the White House, one of the most heavily surveilled areas of the world... it's really hard for me to accept that there is a secret, highly portable tech that leaves no clear evidence and this is how it's being used.
- ImPostingOnHN 5y agothere are more things in this world, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy technology-wise, we humans are just fancy cavemen with fire (also, we don't know that this is portable)
- tiahura 5y agoSo, we should call the Ghostbusters?