4 ms·
Yes. I would argue that it is precisely the obsession with cross-platform that has destroyed native desktop applications. If all you are offering with your nati
by thrower123 5y ago
Yes. I would argue that it is precisely the obsession with cross-platform that has destroyed native desktop applications. If all you are offering with your native desktop framework is a dumbed-down experience, because it has to also run on tablets and phones and TVs and game consoles and smart refrigerators, then you quickly get to a place where there are few advantages in going native over shipping a webapp in a Chrome wrapper.
Windows 8 was a catastrophic failure, and Apple seems to be leaning into the same failed philosophy now.
- spaetzleesser 5y ago“and Apple seems to be leaning into the same failed philosophy now.” I agree but when you look at their profits it seems MS and Apple are doing the right thing even if I don’t like it as a developer.
- sally1620 5y agoIt is not really "obsession", it is economics. There is a high cost with maintaining different apps for different platforms.