3 ms·
> To the extent that they made downgrading a paid option, not upgrading. Except that they didn't. With even a little bit of research you can easily find out th
by yawaramin 5y ago
> To the extent that they made downgrading a paid option, not upgrading.
Except that they didn't. With even a little bit of research you can easily find out that they made skipping updates a paid feature, and then even removed that after negative feedback!
People were even talking about downgrading below the version that introduced the 'paid update skipping', so any way you look at it, your comment doesn't make any sense.
- sethherr 5y agoIt’s not a good look and that matters. If I’m going to rely on something for production, and that thing ships breaking changes and considers weird, terrible monetization strategies, I go elsewhere.
- yawaramin 5y agoSpewing FUD is not a good look either. Introducing paid features is not a 'breaking change'–your pipelines and production code continued to work throughout all this–and charging large commercial enterprises for premium features is not a 'weird, terrible monetization strategy'.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- SergeAx 5y agoYou don't use Docker Desktop in production, right? Right?