3 ms·
Bruce Schneier's written a few times on the subject of what the NSA should do, when coming across a powerful exploit. This can be a surprisingly complex calculu
by CobrastanJorji 5y ago
Bruce Schneier's written a few times on the subject of what the NSA should do, when coming across a powerful exploit. This can be a surprisingly complex calculus when you're thinking solely strategically and not specifically about privacy or ethics as goals in of themselves. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/05/should-hackers-fix-cybersecurity-holes-or-exploit-them/371197/ https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/05/shoul...
In this article, Schneier suggests that if the US and China have an iPhone exploit, and exploits are very rare, then the US should disclose and patch it because it's likely that China has the same exploit. But if exploits are not very rare, then the US should not disclose the one it knows because China probably knows a different one, so the US would lose its capability to spy on China but China would still be able to spy on the US. His conclusion, though, is different, and argues for erring on the side of patching bugs.
- dogma1138 5y agoNon state actors with fairly limited budgets seem to be able to get exploits all the time and fairly powerful ones at that. It probably means that exploits are considerably less rare since there are multiple private exploit for hire vendors that target iPhones these days.
- jonplackett 5y agoWould NSO be using one or a couple of powerful exploits this whole time, or would Apple have figured these out by now and fixed? Basically, is it secrecy keeping it working or are they just staying ahead by continuously developing new exploits?
- dogma1138 5y agoApple fixes them and they find new ones, one of the reasons they are successful is because they seem to be able to “guarantee” long term access.