3 ms·
> that will last you the rest of your life by your 40s seems like a good trade-off. I read that to mean "retire at 40". If you retire at 40, your $1M isn't go
by bcrosby95 5y ago
> that will last you the rest of your life by your 40s seems like a good trade-off.
I read that to mean "retire at 40". If you retire at 40, your $1M isn't going to grow to $4M at 50.
- mgkimsal 5y agosure but if you keep spending moderate, it may grow to $2.5M-$3M, as it would probably already be around $2M in those 10 years. Instead of $8M at 60, perhaps you've spent along the way and only end up with $3M at 60?