4 ms·
It was all guns rights until the black panthers started arming up, and all the sudden it was "perhaps some sensible limits might be wise" Pretty hard to miss t
by pope_meat 5y ago
It was all guns rights until the black panthers started arming up, and all the sudden it was "perhaps some sensible limits might be wise"
Pretty hard to miss the intent.
Arm the homeless is what I say when I'm feeling spicy.
- lostapathy 5y agoThis shouldn't be downvoted - the roots of control in the US are absolutely rooted in this kind of racism, whether it be "modern" gun control as mentioned by parent, or the Sullivan Act over a hundred years ago.
- splitstud 5y agoWhy shouldn't it? It's a complete and total fabrication used to smear a segment of the population.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- Clubber 5y agoYup, California was an open carry state until the GOP assemblyman Mulford and GOP Governor Ronald Reagan signed the Mulford Act into law banning the legal carry of loaded firearms. History is indeed stranger than fiction. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulford_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulford_Act the bill was crafted with the goal of disarming members of the Black Panther Party who were conducting armed patrols of Oakland neighborhoods, in what would later be termed copwatching.[1][2] They garnered national attention after Black Panthers members, bearing arms, marched upon the California State Capitol to protest the bill.
- AniseAbyss 5y agoYeah armed black militias marching through white suburban America will get the FBI interested.
- collegeburner 5y agoVery pro-2A people agree that gun control is racist though. Mainstream republican party (what people think of as pro-2a) isnt very. Trump implemented bump stock restrictions, hell, reagan signed 86 new machine gun ban. If you talk to very pro-2a people you will hear them agree that armed minorities are harder to oppress; gun control is indeed very racist going back to army/navy laws and other restrictions on former slaves owning arms.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]