The court system has come a long way since then, and does not usually enforce religious doctrine. If the next Copernicus or Galileo among the people writing fak

The court system has come a long way since then, and does not usually enforce religious doctrine. If the next Copernicus or Galileo among the people writing fake news e.g. [1], [2], [3] presents evidence for their assertions being plausible, and the prosecution fails to prove their assertion was impossible then I doubt a judge would against them. That's why I said narrowly written, to get the worst, repetitive and most obvious examples to stop, not cast a wide net. E.g. [3] [1] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/resources/idt-sh/the_godfather_of_fake_news https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/resources/idt-sh/the_godfather_of... [2] https://www.wired.com/2017/02/veles-macedonia-fake-news/ https://www.wired.com/2017/02/veles-macedonia-fake-news/ [3] https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/local/verify-was-clinton-foundation-cargo-ship-raided-at-port-of-baltimore/65-439392715 https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/local/verify-was-clinton-...