At last, my hours of watching lawyer TV shows comes in handy! A lawyer never assumes what the other side’s argument is, because your rebuttal hinges on exactly

At last, my hours of watching lawyer TV shows comes in handy! A lawyer never assumes what the other side’s argument is, because your rebuttal hinges on exactly how their argument is constructed. Plus you don’t want to give your “opponent” ideas, nor do you want to essentially negotiate against yourself. If you lay out a defense, without a clear thing you are arguing against, the other side could just change their planned argument and say “ok THIS is our actual argument now”. The defense responds, not initiates. So this article makes sense to me - while Coinbase can clearly guess what the SEC might argue, the fact is the SEC hasn’t told them yet. So there’s nothing to respond to (yet).