4 ms·
>Yeah, plus they're practically the only country that hasn't had serious government threatening civil unrest for 160 years and they still brag about guns. Ther
by modo_mario 5y ago
>Yeah, plus they're practically the only country that hasn't had serious government threatening civil unrest for 160 years and they still brag about guns.
There was that miners strike which got bombed.
- oblio 5y agoDo you mean this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonus_Army https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonus_Army Or something else? I guess that's the closest thing that would qualify. But compared to the anti-government protests that have probably happened in half the countries in the world during the same time period, it's peanuts. Example from Romania: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017%E2%80%932019_Romanian_protests https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017%E2%80%932019_Romanian_pro... Half a million people protesting out of ~18 million or so. For reference, that would mean 10 million people protesting at the same time in the US. I wonder if even the civil rights movement during the 60's ever got that many people out on the streets at the exact same time.
- modo_mario 5y agoNo, I meant this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Blair_Mountain https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Blair_Mountain I agree tho. In general the US is rather good at keeping down any kind of protests that pose an existential threat or undermines it's major goals.