The fact is his papers were rejected from highly respected journals. If I send an incorrect math proof to hundreds of math journals and one small open access jo

The fact is his papers were rejected from highly respected journals. If I send an incorrect math proof to hundreds of math journals and one small open access journal decides to publish it, I haven't disproven math, nor would anyone think I had. It seems to me this falls in line with most of the anti-PC "scholarship" that does little more than confirm the biases of people who are primed to believe anything that discredits what they perceive as "PC", "SJW", or "woke."