3 ms·
Comparing hardware costs (whatever you might think of how they've done it) doesn't really hit at the problems of running a mainframe and the TCO involved. 1) S
by raesene9 5y ago
Comparing hardware costs (whatever you might think of how they've done it) doesn't really hit at the problems of running a mainframe and the TCO involved.
1) Single supplier. Have a falling out with IBM.... you're stuffed. that's a major business risk. With x86, don't like HP go to Dell etc.
2) Staffing! What's the relative availability of good S/390 admins and devs, compared to x86? IMHO one of the reasons first mainframes, then AS/400, then proprietary Unix lost out to Linux on x86 was ease of getting staff, which is fuelled by the fact you can start out with a home PC and learn the kind of skills you need.
- numbsafari 5y agoNot to mention geographic resilience. You can’t just own one of something. Plus, when you are at 95% capacity, your only option is to buy 100% more headroom.
- mnd999 5y agoI’m not sure that’s true. Mainframes can scale up as well, in my limited experience you get the thing fully loaded but don’t necessarily pay for all of it. If you need to scale up you just unlock another set of CPUs and pay the vendor a bit more.