Most likely, yes. While the Constitutional Court did not explicitly say so in 1981 when they declared the law unconstitutional, the fact that the only convictio

Most likely, yes. While the Constitutional Court did not explicitly say so in 1981 when they declared the law unconstitutional, the fact that the only conviction was at least highly dubious was definitely a reason to support their decision. The reason given is that it is impossible to distinguish “plagio” and free choice of the alleged victim.