So, removing or editing aparagraph that is factually inaccurate (gender critical writers aren’t biological “essentialists”—-indeed they are rejecting social con

So, removing or editing aparagraph that is factually inaccurate (gender critical writers aren’t biological “essentialists”—-indeed they are rejecting social construct essentialism) is a bong standard journalistic practice, not a transphobic conspiracy. You may disagree with gender critical writers, but they aren’t biological essentialists. Also, she screwed up the Wisconsin spa thing (it really was harassment).