4 ms·

Even if you didn't give specific dollar per person. I agree. There should be known ranges for a position and years of service as minimum Similar to military if

Even if you didn't give specific dollar per person. I agree. There should be known ranges for a position and years of service as minimum Similar to military if you know someone's pay and years. You know their minimum. But they might get additional amount for other reasons. I think a good starting place is say position x pays between 35k and 40k for 1 to 5 years in position. Its removes a little burden on jealously of knowing exact amounts. And the range must be small enough to be reasonable. It can't just be between 30k and 300k. Or as GP said. Give a +- from median. I know its be easier for some to say they make higher end of their range or above max than it is to share specific dollar amount.

stickfigure 5y ago
> There should be known ranges for a position and years of service as minimum Because value production is an exact function of job title and seniority?
- namrog84 5y ago
  There can be 'levels' that is semi-independent from 'job title'. As this is commonly the case in many companies. Many companies have multiple levels for a given job title. Everywhere I've worked in software has had 'levels' with a finite range, and as you reach the upper bound of the range, you move to the next 'level'. There is some overlap in the level's ranges. Also as I originally stated, this is the 'minimum' for simply a starting talking point, it will still allow some to be hidden/obscured. There is always 'additional bonuses/awards' on per project basis. e.g. Project ___ grants an additional $$$ either 1 time bonus on start, on complete, or recurring. If someone's value production is greater, than they should be promoted to the next 'level' which comes with increased compensation.