> It's to a company's benefit to miss twenty qualified applicants than to hire a single unqualified one. This isn't true outside of FAANG. I've seen past empl

> It's to a company's benefit to miss twenty qualified applicants than to hire a single unqualified one. This isn't true outside of FAANG. I've seen past employers hire 20 unqualified people to fill the role of 2-3 qualified people who left. Often paying more in aggregate, but getting a "better deal" on each employee. Heck, the manager now gets promoted to Sr. Director for having so many people under them.