3 ms·

You can always host it yourself. Are you unable to purchase a computer or rent a static IP address? Edit: Actually, with Tor the static IP should be unnecessar

You can always host it yourself. Are you unable to purchase a computer or rent a static IP address? Edit: Actually, with Tor the static IP should be unnecessary. All you need is a computer and an Internet connection.

msla 5y ago
That still places you at the mercy of your Internet provider.
- anoonmoose 5y ago
  And that is why my position on this debate is that Internet access- the pipes, the ability to send data from one computer to another that requested the data- should be treated like a utility. I still think a site should be able to deny your request for data as they see fit though
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
tablespoon 5y ago
> You can always host it yourself. Are you unable to purchase a computer or rent a static IP address? I'm starting to think that can't be counted on as a viable option. It's one thing to deny someone access to a particular platform (e.g. Facebook), it's quite another to deny access to basic infrastructure services (e.g. DNS) for something that isn't actually illegal. The former should not utility-like access rules, but the latter probably should.