4 ms·
As a patent lawyer, can you explain what that claim means? Why does it seem intentionally confusing?
by cosmotic 5y ago
As a patent lawyer, can you explain what that claim means? Why does it seem intentionally confusing?
- bcrosby95 5y ago> Why does it seem intentionally confusing? Because "group entities together in memory by which components they have" isn't patent worthy.
- tinco 5y agoExcept that it might be, because if people knew how to do it, they would have for the past 20 years that ECS have been implemented in the games industry that is notoriously focused on memory locality optimisation. (not that I'm advocating for the patentability of software in general, I just think that if software should be patentable, this sure seems like something that could be)
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- not2b 5y agoThere is a strange rule that each claim in a patent must be one sentence. So they construct these massive run-on sentences.
- cosmotic 5y agoIt's not just the run-on, it's also the pointlessly verbose descriptions using words that aren't used in the industry nor common English