3 ms·
It was because I interpreted his numbers one way, and it was incorrect, due to not being able to access the article. Shouldn't be doing that. My comment is lef
by CobaltFire 5y ago
It was because I interpreted his numbers one way, and it was incorrect, due to not being able to access the article.
Shouldn't be doing that. My comment is left because other's already replied, but I was incorrect.