Unfortunately the article does not describe how the feds "hacked past anonymity": "The Western Louisiana grand jury indictment, unsealed today, doesn't disclos

Unfortunately the article does not describe how the feds "hacked past anonymity": "The Western Louisiana grand jury indictment, unsealed today, doesn't disclose how the Feds got through Dreamboard's security wall," It is kind of funny that the ars technica author used "doesn't" but the lawyers who wrote the indictment had the sense to include "sic" when they quoted "doesn't" from a dreamboard post:)