If this was Google in 2016, it would be very notable and your comments would apply. This is all completely irrelevant as anti-competitive behavior is only an i

If this was Google in 2016, it would be very notable and your comments would apply. This is all completely irrelevant as anti-competitive behavior is only an issue when a company holds a monopoly, which Google did not have in any way in 2005. In the absence of a monopoly position, anti-competitive behavior is completely normal, expected, standard, and does not even merit the label because it is how businesses grow.