> using this against an opponent as described in the article could certainly be used here It's called a "spoiler" and they don't necessarily have to have the s

> using this against an opponent as described in the article could certainly be used here It's called a "spoiler" and they don't necessarily have to have the same or similar names to be effective, in fact, a similar tactic was used here less than a year ago: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/19/us/florida-senate-race-fraud.html https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/19/us/florida-senate-race-fr...