4 ms·
For video hosting I'd go with Peertube.
by betwixthewires 5y ago
For video hosting I'd go with Peertube.
- martin_a 5y agoNo! These networks, no matter how they work under the hood, are obviously the problem, as they are single points of failure. Run your own stuff. Most channels will not have enough visitors/viewers to kill a shared webhosting package, so there's no big deal in doing this on your own.
- betwixthewires 5y agoPeertube is tube site software that you can run yourself. It is a way to run your own stuff. https://joinpeertube.org/ https://joinpeertube.org/
- ipaddr 5y agoCurious how does the network deal with adult or censored content? If self-hosting does one need to join the network?
- betwixthewires 5y agoSo "the network" in context of sites like Facebook or YouTube is a fancy marketing term for "the website." Peertube servers actually federate, so there is actually a network there. You don't have to federate. As host, you can host whatever you want (you are of course subject to laws in the country you're hosting in) and censor whatever you want on your server. You can basically do anything you want. If you host adult content like pornography it is very likely the larger federation will not federate with your server, and for adult content that isn't pornographic in nature it is probably best to require content warnings.