> Because there'd be a financial incentive to kill patent holders? To be fair, a) people don't kill copyright holders before Disney got a hold of the legislati

> Because there'd be a financial incentive to kill patent holders? To be fair, a) people don't kill copyright holders before Disney got a hold of the legislation (or did they?) and b) I imagine the legal ramifications would outweigh, at least largely in part, the benefits of assassination.