It wasn't missed, from what I saw in the issue and pull request. It was offered, and ignored. Part of me thinks that's a shame, because it seems like it's jus

It wasn't missed, from what I saw in the issue and pull request. It was offered, and ignored. Part of me thinks that's a shame, because it seems like it's just that a for-profit entity behind the project was the only reason for doing so, but at the same time, the outcome isn't bad I think. Having multiple high-quality choices with different driving causes (and organizations) behind them is more beneficial in the long run than just one. Competition is good, even in open source, most the time.