4 ms·
I just tried to embed one of these on a test site. It's really not that useful. The HTML code ends up taking up half a screen. I'd prefer these icons dumped in
by bprater 15y ago
I just tried to embed one of these on a test site. It's really not that useful. The HTML code ends up taking up half a screen.
I'd prefer these icons dumped into a custom font file. Then it takes up literally one character in HTML and can be completely modified using CSS.
- josephcooney 15y agoreally? Because fonts on the web are so much easier to deal with than PNG files?
- jenius 15y agoThey come in svg format, which work on most modern browsers as well
- josephcooney 15y agoYes, but PNGs will be easier to deal with than SVG and webfonts. I guess SVG give you the flexibility of turning them into high-fidelity versions of whatever you want. I regularly use nounproject SVGs to create 'icons' in Microsoft's vector XAML format.