4 ms·
Vast majority of the screen-shotted tweets don't seem any worse than what the author was dishing out (e.g: https://i.imgur.com/ysm7yxp.png https://i.imgur.com/y
by treesprite82 5y ago
Vast majority of the screen-shotted tweets don't seem any worse than what the author was dishing out (e.g: https://i.imgur.com/ysm7yxp.png https://i.imgur.com/ysm7yxp.png - or more often calling them assholes/grifters/immoral). At the same time the sheer quantity of unpleasant replies probably feels overwhelming when you're just one person, and there are a couple of truly awful responses thrown in there.
- rvz 5y agoSeems like the author of the tweet is just as bad as the critics in the screenshot. Perhaps reflective of how they feel and see cryptocurrencies in general. The first sentence (excluding the subtitle) in the article they linked [0] in the tweet arguing against cryptocurrencies and NFTs in general tells you that they are very angry most likely irrational and it is shown throughout the whole article if you read it. In the the first sentence of [0]: > 'I am so mad I had to write this, the world’s most self-evident take: but here is the article you can send to people when they say “but the environmental issues with cryptoart will be solved soon, right?”' Not the best start into writing a rational critique or convincing the skeptics is it? [0] https://everestpipkin.medium.com/but-the-environmental-issues-with-cryptoart-1128ef72e6a3 https://everestpipkin.medium.com/but-the-environmental-issue...