3 ms·
I would think not having used an acquired patent in offensive litigation is the salient dissimilarity. One would have to be willfully ignorant not to see that.
by pohl 15y ago
I would think not having used an acquired patent in offensive litigation is the salient dissimilarity.
One would have to be willfully ignorant not to see that.
- fpgeek 15y agoDoesn't everyone expect that the acquired patents are going to be used against Android? Doesn't the makeup of the winning consortium argue for that interpretation?