3 ms·
Re: one a day By coincidence, earlier today I had the same idea. I was thinking about how so much of what you encounter in social media is biased towards peopl
by Stupulous 5y ago
Re: one a day
By coincidence, earlier today I had the same idea. I was thinking about how so much of what you encounter in social media is biased towards people who post a lot.
In politics, for example, most people are relatively moderate. People who spend more time talking about politics are more likely to hold extreme positions. And people who spend the most time talking about politics are the ones who spend the least time evaluating their and others' positions. So the political social media is dominated by uneducated extremists with hot takes. (I admit this often includes myself, though I do try to put effort into my comments).
A possible solution to this would be reducing the amount of allowed posts per time, which would quiet the noise and give high-effort interactions a more level playing field. Of course, that sucks for engagement and interferes with topics like humor that benefit from low-effort contributions. I wonder if there's a client-side way to bias your feed towards people who post less frequently.
- darig 5y agoAny only system that attempts to limit the bandwidth of single accounts will be overrun by forged and stolen accounts to make up for the restrictions. At the same time, honest account holders are silenced, unable to counter. The system is doomed to fail.
- pbronez 5y agoI agree. Honestly, one a week would be great.