3 ms·
Both generations of magsafe adapters were by far superior to USB-C. I feel like both ends are pretty fragile now.
by titzer 5y ago
Both generations of magsafe adapters were by far superior to USB-C. I feel like both ends are pretty fragile now.
- codesnik 5y agobut now you can switch them. twice the longevity! just kidding, I recently wrapped both ends in shrinking tubes, seem to stop fraying (for now)
- Reason077 5y agoAt least you only need to replace the cable now. Back in the day, you had to replace the entire adapter when the plug end inevitably started fraying.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- Reason077 5y agoI don't find USB-C fragile at all. I don't think I've ever had a USB-C connector break and I've been using them for, what, about 5 years now? Of course, there's always the risk of tripping on a cable and sending a laptop or phone flying, which MagSafe mitigated. But the USB-C cable also disconnects at both ends which helps a bit. And I think we spend less time charging in general now days. Laptop batteries were pretty terrible back in 1999 compared to the all-day battery life of our modern M1 Macs :)
- titzer 5y agoI've broken at least one micro USB port and I've had a couple close calls with the Macbook USB-C power cable that the poor notebook's life flashed before my eyes.
- Reason077 5y agoYeah, micro USB was terrible. But USB-C is a big improvement.
- titzer 5y agoIt is, but magsafe saved my bacon several times over the years and I'm still skittish with the Macbook USB-C situation. Even just sitting it on my lap with it plugged in bends the cable in ways that seem dangerous. Thankfully, the battery life is amazing, so that's not as much of an issue.
- kalleboo 5y agoWith MagSafe I was replacing the adapter yearly. With USB-C, I bought third party USB-C cables that are braided and have (gasp) strain-relief, and they hold up great.