6 ms·
> But their technology, policies and the strength of Swiss privacy law [1] make them a less-ideal coöperator for the NSA than e.g. Google or Comcast. There is
by nicce 5y ago
> But their technology, policies and the strength of Swiss privacy law [1] make them a less-ideal coöperator for the NSA than e.g. Google or Comcast.
There is also another viewpoint. Since ProtonMail is non-USA company, any internet activity associated with non-US citizens isn't protected by the US Constitution when CIA et al. are in action. They can do whatever they please.
Also, the background of the ProtonMail is not so clear.
Many might not know as they have tried to hide it, but MIT guys have been in big part of originally writing the ProtonMail, which can be linked to CIA/NSA oversight[1].
Also, major part from the equity ownership belongs to U.S (Charles River Ventures was one of the first big funders, and this naturally happens)
I also leave this interesting link here[2] (The Truth About Protonmail).
[1]: https://web.archive.org/web/20210226014214/https://privacy-watchdog.io/protonmails-creation-with-cia-nsa/ https://web.archive.org/web/20210226014214/https://privacy-w...
[2]: https://web.archive.org/web/20210220023958/https://privacy-watchdog.io/truth-about-protonmail/ https://web.archive.org/web/20210220023958/https://privacy-w...
- protonmail 5y agoThis is all false unfortunately. First, Charles River Ventures is no longer a shareholder: https://protonmail.com/blog/crv-investment-other-news/ https://protonmail.com/blog/crv-investment-other-news/ Second, all of ProtonMail's code that runs on your device is open source and independently audited. It would be nearly impossible to hide a backdoor in there.
- nicce 5y ago> Second, all of ProtonMail's code that runs on your device is open source and independently audited. When will you support reproducible builds, or are you supporting it already? Because only then we can be 100% that same code is actually running in there without reverse-engineering between every update.