Yuck. This argument is consistently framed as a false dichotomy: either get rid of pseudonyms or keep them. Why not both? Some places, like Google+, might be n

Yuck. This argument is consistently framed as a false dichotomy: either get rid of pseudonyms or keep them. Why not both? Some places, like Google+, might be nom-de-plum-free. Some, like reddit, might not. Why make it one way or the other? I can easily foresee an internet that has parts that are "real person only" and parts that are the wild west. For that matter, some parts, like banking access, might be even more locked down. I don't think we have to make some massive decision for all of it. Let it evolve and bifurcate as it needs to.