2 ms·

https://www.nber.org/papers/w26598 https://www.nber.org/papers/w26598

• pfdietz 5y ago
  That paper is comparing what happened to what would have happened without the nuclear phase out. That is, coal would have gone down MORE if nuclear had not been phased out. It does not support your claim that nuclear was replaced by coal. As the graph I gave you shows, coal use there declined over this decade, even as nuclear has also declined.