7 ms·
Unless they plan for their repo to have zero contrib policy and open merge rights, they will also have to follow rules and force people to follow their (third p
by theelous3 5y ago
Unless they plan for their repo to have zero contrib policy and open merge rights, they will also have to follow rules and force people to follow their (third party) rules.
Sometimes it's worthwhile to consider that the "third party rules" you don't want to abide, are there for good reason.
Furthermore, sometimes the underlying reason for those rules is something you can hack on and open up.
"Oh we won't ever support feature X because of legacy arch Y so no PRs for feature X please". Well, perhaps you can solve legacy arch Y and help everyone at a more fundamental level.
- majkinetor 5y agoHowever, open source is almost 100% about "selfish" things like exploration, passion, relaxing etc. as shown by the number of projects that have exactly 1 maintainer (almost all of them). Linux and friends are exceptions and majority of devs working on those are payed by big corps and that is their regular job.