2 ms·
It just sounds like a scrum of scrums on a tricky project. I'm on a major project now where there are 80-90 people across around a dozen workstreams trying to
by jcims 5y ago
It just sounds like a scrum of scrums on a tricky project.
I'm on a major project now where there are 80-90 people across around a dozen workstreams trying to stay coordinated on a fast moving project in a highly regulated industry. We usually wrap in 20-30 mins but it has definitely taken hour in the past just due to the sheer number of interdependencies and hard gates.
- social_quotient 5y ago20-30 sounds reasonable. And should more in the weeds discussion be needed it should become the source of specific follow ups. It’s the standing 1 hour meeting where some people leave thinking it’s a waste of time. The waste is what agile is about, or not about. If it’s productive, needed, or even just healthy then it’s appropriate IMO. Thx for sharing.