3 ms·
> As the article explained, if he can provide evidence of how he came by the money legally, he gets it back. Otherwise the federal government is breaking the la
by simiones 5y ago
> As the article explained, if he can provide evidence of how he came by the money legally, he gets it back. Otherwise the federal government is breaking the law, no?
Even on the face of it, that is a blatant violation of the presumption of innocence and it boggles the mind that this is deemed constitutional in the USA. Even the 90 day term is wildly unacceptable for taking someone's possessions without a clear cause - perhaps 90 minutes?