4 ms·
I tried to prove that crops which do not preserve photographic centre are detectable https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/367981/3194 https://physics.stackexcha
by z5h 5y ago
I tried to prove that crops which do not preserve photographic centre are detectable https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/367981/3194 https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/367981/3194
This was after photographers seemed to not believe this was the case https://photo.stackexchange.com/q/86550/45128 https://photo.stackexchange.com/q/86550/45128
In any case, detecting cropped photos could be a way to detect that something has been intentionally omitted after the fact.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- jobigoud 5y agoBut cameras aren't perfect pinholes though. The center of the sensor and the optical axis of the lens are already not perfectly aligned, and the sensor is not necessarily perpendicular to the lens barrel. These distortions might be larger than any change of size due to an object being in the periphery of the field of view, especially for longer focal length where the rays are more parallel.
- z5h 5y agoCorrect. So, in theory it works and in practice it works with limitations. You could probably create a lens/camera calibration profile that could take the practical use further.
- lupire 5y agocropping is 0.01% of what makes a misleading photo misleading. And content-aware fill can uncrop.