4 ms·
There aren’t good integrated replacements. Any system that lacks a wysisyg interface for text is not a viable option. If copy and paste from Word doesn’t keep s
by kayodelycaon 5y ago
There aren’t good integrated replacements. Any system that lacks a wysisyg interface for text is not a viable option. If copy and paste from Word doesn’t keep some of the formatting, forget it.
Our support board has customized forms. These forms create tickets that can seamlessly be moved to our scrum board once they are vetted. We use JQL to manage a lot of the boards we use. We have custom workflows for different ticket types. We use the comprehensive access controls to grant partial access to users based on custom roles.
None of this rigidly enforces our workflows (aside form access control). Instead, it streamlines sharing information across departments.
When it comes to a company wiki system, Confluence is extremely hard to beat. (I’ve use so many wiki systems. Dokuwiki is my goto.)
All of these systems use a single user account. We use single sign-on, but we don’t have a large IT department to manage the dozens of services we access every day.
- gurkendoktor 5y ago> There aren’t good integrated replacements I think even that would be a good attack vector against Atlassian: For them, "integration" means adding links from one product to the other. If I were to pay for an integrated suite of tools, the least I would expect is that their bloody markup languages are consistent. But because Atlassian just buys random products and then doesn't seem to ever change a single thing about them, that's not going to happen.
- laurent92 5y agoThat’s false: Confluence went from Wikimarkup in 2008 to wysiwyg in 2010 (to big uproars); and they are uniformizing all their cloud products under the new ADF editor.
- gurkendoktor 5y agoThanks, that's good to hear. A quick Google search makes it sound like it will finally be possible to use `backticks` for code everywhere.