4 ms·

Doesn't matter what it was. https://emojipedia.org/black-left-pointing-index/ https://emojipedia.org/black-left-pointing-index/

rvz 5y ago
You mean this? (U+261A) and not (U+1F448) [0] [1]? From: [0] > This Unicode character has no emoji version, meaning this is intended to display only as a black and white glyph on most platforms. I guess that means '' and 'U+261A' are emojis then? [0] https://emojipedia.org/black-left-pointing-index/ https://emojipedia.org/black-left-pointing-index/ [1] https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+261A https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+261A
- yreg 5y ago
   is not specified by Unicode. Why are you so angry?
  - rvz 5y ago
    A very simple question: Is '' aka (U+F8FF) and 'U+261A' emojis? Yes or No?
    - Ceiling 5y ago
      Emoji: a small digital image or icon used to express an idea, emotion, etc. Often times, yes.
    - jfk13 5y ago
      > '' aka (U+F8FF) In passing: Many HN readers on non-Apple platforms probably don't see the glyph you intended in this comment. The Apple logo does not exist as a character in the Unicode standard. U+F8FF is a Private Use Area codepoint, which has no standardised, interoperable meaning. Yes, Apple uses this codepoint for the logo in their fonts, but that's purely a private matter, largely restricted to their platforms. (I wouldn't be surprised if non-Apple fonts that include it are actually violating a trademark, or something like that.)
      - rvz 5y ago
        > Many HN readers on non-Apple platforms probably don't see the glyph you intended in this comment. That is the whole point of my comments. They cannot ever see it unless they are running on an Apple platform. Unless they wanted to see an empty box, the symbol is meaningless to non-Apple users. That is why I asked 'Can you see it?' Even posting the 'U+261A' glyph here on HN renders nothing and a box on other sites and that is defined in the standard; but they still cannot see it. So that is a definite 'No' then for '' aka (U+F8FF) and the same for 'U+261A'? OK. It has been indirectly admitted. Case closed.
    - hnthrowaway4829 5y ago
      Yes

rvz 5y ago

You mean this? (U+261A) and not (U+1F448) [0] [1]? From: [0] > This Unicode character has no emoji version, meaning this is intended to display only as a black and white glyph on most platforms. I guess that means '' and 'U+261A' are emojis then? [0] https://emojipedia.org/black-left-pointing-index/ https://emojipedia.org/black-left-pointing-index/ [1] https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+261A https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+261A

yreg 5y ago
 is not specified by Unicode. Why are you so angry?
- rvz 5y ago
  A very simple question: Is '' aka (U+F8FF) and 'U+261A' emojis? Yes or No?
  - Ceiling 5y ago
    Emoji: a small digital image or icon used to express an idea, emotion, etc. Often times, yes.
  - jfk13 5y ago
    > '' aka (U+F8FF) In passing: Many HN readers on non-Apple platforms probably don't see the glyph you intended in this comment. The Apple logo does not exist as a character in the Unicode standard. U+F8FF is a Private Use Area codepoint, which has no standardised, interoperable meaning. Yes, Apple uses this codepoint for the logo in their fonts, but that's purely a private matter, largely restricted to their platforms. (I wouldn't be surprised if non-Apple fonts that include it are actually violating a trademark, or something like that.)
    - rvz 5y ago
      > Many HN readers on non-Apple platforms probably don't see the glyph you intended in this comment. That is the whole point of my comments. They cannot ever see it unless they are running on an Apple platform. Unless they wanted to see an empty box, the symbol is meaningless to non-Apple users. That is why I asked 'Can you see it?' Even posting the 'U+261A' glyph here on HN renders nothing and a box on other sites and that is defined in the standard; but they still cannot see it. So that is a definite 'No' then for '' aka (U+F8FF) and the same for 'U+261A'? OK. It has been indirectly admitted. Case closed.
  - hnthrowaway4829 5y ago
    Yes