10 ms·
"However, the content and the context in which it is taught" I don't know how you interpret that as anything but a commentary on the teaching of mathematics. T
by notacoward 5y ago
"However, the content and the context in which it is taught"
I don't know how you interpret that as anything but a commentary on the teaching of mathematics. The excerpt supports my point, not yours. Maybe Ontario should look into their curriculum for reading as well as for mathematics.
> please research the topic
Stop projecting. I posted a link to the original source material before you did, and I interpreted it as a sane person would rather than how the Canadian equivalent of Fox News told people to. That's more diligence than you have shown.
- busymom0 5y agoYou first accused me of lying about Ontario's "subjective mathematics" announcement. So I showed you how that's exactly what they had: > An equitable mathematics curriculum recognizes that mathematics can be subjective. Mathematics is often positioned as an objective and pure discipline. thus refuting your "misinformation" claim. Claiming I am making false accusations while I am literally citing the archive page and the governor's response of why they removed the "subjective" nonsense is plain mental gymnastics. Why don't you simply agree that I was correct since even Doug Ford admits the nonsense was there in the curriculum? Yet you continue to play partisan politics and then bring up Fox News out of nowhere? I neither follow Fox News, nor do I follow any Canadian equivalent. I don't follow any corporate media. Please don't bother replying as you seem more interested in ad hominem attacks.
- notacoward 5y agoYes, the document exists. Nobody ever denied that. But no matter how you try to spin it, no matter how many schoolyard-rhetoric tricks you try to apply so you can have the last word, your presentation of it was still cherry-picked and exaggerated at best and that was my original point.